11 Comments

  1. PROFESSOR HELEN REES WILL HAVE TO COME TO MY HOUSE TO CONFISCATE MY 200 BOXES OF IVERMECTIN . BUT SORRY ,I DO NOT ALLOW THIEVES OR STUPID PEOPLE ON MY PROPERTY .

    11
  2. Thus far, my attempt to reach the ‘SAHPRA Report on revoking the use of Ivermectin for treating Civid-19’ (whose error was ‘Civid’?) gave me a time-out message. I assume that in such circumstances, one needs to keep trying from time to time. I don’t suspect the URL of erroneously identifying the website, as the first message clearly indicated that sahpra was taking too long to respond, not that it didn’t exist.

    5
  3. There is a Veterinarian formulation of Ivermectin and a formulation for human prescription medication.
    I can understand declining a veterinarian formulation for human application BUT a formulation proven safe for human patients whether it is effective or not against CoVID19 (SARS-CoV2) makes little sense. On the other hand if Ivermectin is shown to cause adverse reactions in the human subject THEN there may be reasonable grounds to issue a causionary regarding its use.
    The decision is short in detail.

    6
  4. Recall, vaccination does not cure a disease. Vaccination bolsters immunity through stimulating the immune system to create antibodies in advance of infection.

    Ivermectin is a prophylactic, afaik, a chemical compound (formulation) that is alleged to counter the effects of SARS-CoV2. Whether it destroys the virus or not I would not know, but seems to provide relief long enough for the viral load to decline or dissappear or for the bodies immune system to respsond.

    7
  5. While we’re facing worldwide skulduggery, as painfully evident in the above attachments regarding SAHPRA’s revoking the use of Ivermectin for treating Covid-19 and the Powerpoint document showing how compromised South African Health is, it’s good to encounter an Elon Musk.

    I recently happened upon the ensuing video involving him, but it didn’t blow my mind; I’d already concluded, though I hardly know the man, that there was something good in him:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0H_fXxVn8k

    It’s not clear where Twitter will end up, but Elon bought it with the intention of establishing a social platform on which users could interact honestly, without fear of being silenced by those behind the official Covid-19 narrative, who do so with the help and support of fake mainstream media and most social platforms, as well as so-called fact checkers, whose defective or complicit brains spew much nonsense in defense of the indefensible.

    4
  6. James Evert wrote:

    There is a Veterinarian formulation of Ivermectin and a formulation for human prescription medication.

    On the other hand if Ivermectin is shown to cause adverse reactions in the human subject THEN there may be reasonable grounds to issue a cautionary regarding its use.
    The decision is short in detail.

    AND

    Recall, vaccination does not cure a disease. Vaccination bolsters immunity…

    Ivermectin is a prophylactic, afaik, a chemical compound (formulation) that is alleged to counter the effects of SARS-CoV2.

    … [it] seems to provide relief long enough for the viral load to decline or dissappear or for the bodies immune system to respond.

    You hit the nail on the head, however, the SAHPRA decision lacks detail because it intentionally witheld the available detail, which clearly supports its original decision to approve the use of Ivermectin and not its decision to withdraw that approval.

    Ivermectin, which earned a Nobel Prize and is or was FDA and SAHPRA approved (used off-label for Covid-19), Hydroxychloroquine, Chloroquine and other products are not vaccines, but have been used with great success by doctors treating so-called Covid patients, who have largely recovered without being admitted to hospital after having been denied proper early treatment, as so many patients were.

    To add insult to injury, I believe SAHPRA, like the USA’s FDA, has approved the use of Remdesivir in the treatment of the so-called Covid-19 virus, which has apparently not yet been isolated to prove that it exists. Remdesivir seems to have been chosen from a group of products examined for the purpose, a group in which every other product was likely a better candidate than it was; in fact, Remdesivir was recalled as a failure in the treatment of Ebola, and offers some serious adverse effects, including kidney failure.

    I’m reminded of an American doctor, possibly Dr Ardis, who said that he had come to the conclusion that one should use what Dr Fauxci denigrates and avoid what he recommends (no joking); of course, that is also largely valid with the FDA, except when Dr Fauxci contradicts himself, as he did when vacillating between recommending and discounting the use of masks, not recommended by many doctors passionate about their Hippocratic Oath, and when he finally acknowledged that the favoured PCR test was unreliable. False positives of up to 97% have been reported, yet regulations, compromised politicians and or many medical practitioners still require such useless testing; I also note that no corresponding adjustments have been made to Covid-19 case counts.

    While we face this minefield of skulduggery, Governments around the world are amending legislation to replace temporary pandemic measures with permanent ones that, if anything, are more Draconian and will enable authorities, on the slightest suspicion, to remove any individual to a Government facility for isolation, testing (even unreliable PCR-type) and or treatment, including so-called mandatory vaccination.

    SOUTH AFRICANS, if you haven’t already, go to the website, Dear South Africa for information and assistance with submission of comments to the Health Ministry and or other arms of Government. Comment has been requested concerning impending amendments to the National Health Act and must be submitted by August 5, but should likely be submitted earlier in view of Government’s intention to conclude an agreement with the WHO (World Health Organisation), in terms of which it will become responsible for such measures as have been described briefly above and with the same disregard for basic human rights gauranteed by the Nuremberg Code and the South African Constitution; in particular, this relates to the right to refuse any treatment, not only injection with a dangerous drug that doesn’t warrant the description ‘vaccine’. We cannot rely on individuals compromised by a conflict of interests arising from their involvement with the official narrative, Big Pharma and corrupt Goverments.

    9
  7. Make your own products at home. Both Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. Easy peasy.

    2
  8. This is all money driven and people at Sapra in in the hands of Bill Gates.When this is all over these people will be put in jail for lieing to the people.Wonder if its worth permanently loosing you license for.The death penalty should be on the table for crimes against humanity ,lots of which are in the covid scam.

    5

Comments are closed.