The report which may end the political career of President Cyril Ramaphosa is a strange — and in parts comical — document. It’s possible it could be challenged in court. But it also highlights undeniable problems with Ramaphosa’s account of what happened at Phala Phala.
2 thoughts on “Why was President Ramaphosa allowed to provide limited evidence to the Phala Phala panel investigating him?”
Comments are closed.
And the chessboard is still relevant !
FRASERS LANGUAGE IS AFRIKAANS — BANK MEANS COUCH — SO THEY TRANSFERRED THE MONEY FROM ONE BANK TO THE NEXT BANK — COMMON PRACTICE BETWEEN ABSA AND STANDARD BANK — THEY DO IT ELECTRONICALLY — BUT IT TAKES TWO WORKING DAYS AND IT COST YOU AN ARM AND A LEG — SO TWO KIND OF THIEVES — MAYBE THREE ..