- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Evidence of Harm to Unborn and Nursing Infants and Their Mothers
More than any other aspect of the COVID-19 democide, the information in this article clearly reveals the depth of the evil that we must defeat.
FOR COMPLETE DETAILS: NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots – Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get It
Dr. James Thorp, OBGYN on Tucker Carlson: Harms of the Covid Vaccine For Pregnant Women
COVID-19 “Vaccine” Effects on Women of Reproductive Age and Pregnancy
On April 23, 2021, during a high-profile White House COVID-19 press briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced CDC’s new recommendation that all pregnant women receive the COVID-19 “vaccine.” Apparently basing this recommendation on a misleading CDC study published just days before, Walensky publicly declared that the vaccines appeared to be safe for pregnant women.
However, the study showed precisely the opposite.
The researchers followed outcomes in 3,958 vaccinated pregnant women between mid-December 2020 and the end of February 2021. During this ten-week window, 827 women completed their pregnancy, of which 712 (86.1%) were live births and 115 (13.9%) pregnancy losses. Of the pregnancy losses, 104 were spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), the vast majority of which (92.3%) occurred before thirteen weeks of gestation.
Upon review of the data, however, 700 women (84.6%) weren’t “vaccinated” until the third trimester, long after most miscarriages (spontaneous abortions) occur. Nonetheless, authors included these 700 third-trimester “vaccinations” in the denominator of the first trimester miscarriages when they calculated the spontaneous abortion rate.
Based on their statistical sleight of hand, authors pegged the spontaneous abortion rate at 12.6% (104/827) when, in fact, it was truthfully 82% (104/127) in the relevant (first) trimester). It should be noted that the miscarriage rate was remarkably close to the Pfizer 5.3.6 study’s finding of a ten-week post-market miscarriage rate (81%).
The astonishingly high miscarriage rate in the CDC study is comparable to the efficacy of the popular “abortion pill” RU486, which carries an FDA black box warning to alert consumers to major drug risks.
And yet the CDC study concluded there were no obvious safety concerns.
SOURCE: Toxic Shot – Facing the Dangers of the COVID “Vaccines”
Miscarriages/Stillbirths
PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO COMPREHEND WHAT THE DATA IN THE ABOVE GRAPHS MEAN!
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health
COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
The highest stillbirth rate in the U.S. appears to be present in the geographic locations that impose the greatest pressure on pregnant women to be vaccinated, the concerning rates (and vaccination rates) in Canada are even worse. Five professionals (two physicians and three doulas) noted an unprecedented 13 stillbirths in a 24-hour period at Lions Gate Hospital in British Columbia.
The administration of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and women of reproductive age should be halted immediately
Dr. James Thorp
COVID-19 “Vaccine” Effects on Women of Reproductive Age and Pregnancy
The modRNA shots are still endorsed by public health agencies for use in pregnant women, despite clear signs of the dangers to reproductive health in lab data from Moderna, post-marketing safety data gathered by Pfizer and demographic data showing dramatic shifts in fertility. (page 187)
Within weeks of introduction, Pfizer’s own post-market safety monitoring (as detailed in the company’s 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis submission to FDA) showed the COVID-19 gene therapy to be the most lethal medical intervention ever rolled out to the public in medical history. To our knowledge, no other drug, medicine, vaccine or medical intervention has ever been associated with 1,223 deaths in the first ten weeks after rollout to the public. (December 14, 2020 through February 28, 2021). By historic standards, based on this number alone, all modRNA genetic therapies masquerading as “vaccines” should have been removed from public consumption in December 2020. (page 189)
FDA and CDC use a twofold increase as triggering a safety signal, yet we found a 57-fold increase in miscarriage, and a 38-fold increase in fetal death (stillbirth) following COVID-19 “vaccination,” when compared to influenza vaccines. Eighteen distinct adverse events types, including abnormal menses and seventeen other major pregnancy complications all exceeded CDC and FDA signals. (page 190)
The Pfizer post-marketing data covering the first phase, through February 28, 2021.
In a cohort of 270 pregnant mothers, there were danger signals documenting an 81% rate of miscarriage (spontaneous abortion) in the first trimester, a 5-fold increase in still births (fetal death at or after twenty weeks), an 8-fold increase in neonatal mortality rate and a 14.7% complication rate in breastfed infants.
Extending the time frame to March 15, 2022, Pfizer’s second phase of post-market safety monitoring elaborated the same pattern, with increasing numbers of adverse events affecting pregnancies as more pregnant women received the shots. By that time, Pfizer documents analyzed by Daily Clout revealed 1,809 cases of spontaneous abortions in “vaccinated” pregnant women.
THE DailyClout analysis of Pfizer data uncovered large numbers of other reproductive harms and disregulations, especially regarding menstrual cycles.
The list included:
- 27,685 cases of heavy menstrual bleeding;
- 15,083 cases of irregular menstruation;
- 13,989 cases of delayed menstruation;
- 13,904 cases of pain during menstruation;
- 12,424 cases of bleeding between periods; and
- 11,363 cases of absent menstruation. (pages 191-192)
SOURCE: Toxic Shot – Facing the Dangers of the COVID “Vaccines”
Thousands of women reported losing their unborn child within days of receiving the COVID-19 injections!
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/nurse-exposes-shocking-rise-in-post-vaccine-fetal-death/
https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1865195291156062305
Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I
The CDC/FDA’s safety signals were breached for all 37 Adverse Events following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy:
- miscarriage
- fetal chromosomal abnormality
- fetal malformation
- cervical insufficiency
- premature rupture of membranes
- premature labor
- premature delivery
- placental calcification
- placental infarction
- placental thrombosis
- placenta accreta
- placental abruption
- placental insufficiency
- placental disorder
- fetal maternal hemorrhage
- fetal growth restriction
- reduced amniotic fluid volume
- preeclampsia
- fetal heart rate abnormality
- fetal cardiac disorder
- fetal vascular mal-perfusion
- fetal arrhythmia
- fetal distress
- fetal biophysical profile abnormal
- hemorrhage in pregnancy
- fetal cardiac arrest
- fetal death (stillbirth)
- premature infant death
- neonatal asphyxia
- neonatal dyspnea
- neonatal infection
- neonatal hemorrhage
- insufficient breast milk
- neonatal pneumonia
- neonatal respiratory distress
- neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
- neonatal seizure
All 37 Adverse Events breach CDC/FDA limits for safety and are consistent with the authors’ extensive clinical observations.
The magnitude of these safety deviations is unparalleled… as a cause for alarm.
Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part II
Conclusions:
CDC/FDA has failed to capture and account for a significant number of Adverse Event (AE) case reports following COVID-19 in VAERS by a variety of techniques in an apparent attempt to sanitize the data.
CDC’s Rochelle Walensky and NEJM’s Editor-in-Chief Eric Rubin pushed novel untested COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women despite clear evidence from multiple sources that safety signals had been breached.
Audio Interview: Covid-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy — A Conversation with CDC Director Rochelle Walensky
Pay close attention at the following times:
- 11:08-13:20
- 16:00-17:1
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106836
Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons
ORIGINAL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
“CORRECTED”: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMx210016
Figure 3 shows a screen shot from the NEJM article28 proving a spontaneous abortion rate of 82% (104/127), not the study’s claimed risk of 12.6% (104/827).29,30 A 12.6% rate of spontaneous abortion is still far too high in a well-established viable pregnancy after the initial visit. Interestingly, the Shimabukuro article’s actual spontaneous abortion rate of 82% is nearly identical to that of Pfizer’s 5.3.6 post market analysis rate of 81% (page 12)17 – discussed in Part I of this series. The Shimabukuro NEJM article’s28 82% spontaneous abortion rate rivals that of the “abortion pill” (RU486, mifepristone) that carries a mandatory FDA “black box warning”.
Watch the lie for yourself:
Notice how Rochelle Walensky stumbles when she states that “no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the third trimester of, um, um, or safety concerns for their babies.”
Please note that she conveniently neglected to mention the 82% miscarriage rate among women who received the COVID-19 injections in their first trimester.
Dr. James Thorp Accuses Medical Boards of Collusion with Feds
Please watch the video below:
https://rumble.com/v66146d-dr.-james-thorp-accuses-medical-boards-of-collusion-with-feds.html
Dr. James Thorp provides a summary of the collusion:
In Forbes Magazine University of Pennsylvania was again one of the top two U.S. universities (with Johns Hopkins) leading the nation in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. In federal fiscal year 2023, the most recent year for which relatively complete data are available, University of Pennsylvania received $703,217,343. It is an established fact that researchers will side with the bias of their employer and their source of research funding. Professor Morris how is that not extreme bias affecting your opinions and publications?
I am an extensively published and experienced physician in the specialties of ObGyn and Maternal-Fetal Medicine with almost 46 years of clinical experience. After multiple publications on the effects of the COVID-19 experimental gene therapy injections in pregnancy shared with my employer at the time, SSM Health St Louis, I was fired on June 29, 2023. This occurred 2 years after SSM Health St. Louis received $306.9 million entering into a secret, quid pro quo, cooperative agreement with HHS in early 2021. This arrangement could be more accurately described as a BRIBE. Then, SSM Health CEO Kevin Elledge after honoring me as a model physician for their system, attempted to BRIBE me with $90,000 to sign a separation agreement including an NDA and harsh non disparagement clause. I declined.
The American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG) threatened 60,000 ObGyn physicians with their medical licenses and their board certifications if they spread misinformation regarding COVID-19 on September 27, 2021. How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications? https://abog.org/about-abog/news-announcements/2021/09/27/statement-regarding-dissemination-of-covid-19-misinformation
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) was proven in a freedom of information act request to have received massive amounts of money to remain in lockstep with the draconian COVID-19 protocols of the United States, Department of health and human services (HHS).
How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications?
FOIA Reveals Troubling Relationship between HHS/CDC & the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists – America Out Loud https://www.americaoutloud.news/foia-reveals-troubling-relationship-between-hhs-cdc-the-american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists/
The department of Health and Human Services (HHS) entered into quid pro quo relationships (corporative agreements) – more accurately described as BRIBES – giving $186 billion to over 420,000 hospitals and physician systems to support their draconian COVID-19 protocols. No Hospital or their employee could’ve published a study contrary to the HHS narrative or they would’ve lost their funding or their jobs – like I experienced. How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications?
COVID-19 Government Relief Funds Turned the Healthcare Industry on Its Head – America Out Loud News https://www.americaoutloud.news/covid-19-government-relief-funds-turned-the-healthcare-industry-on-its-head/
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have colluded with physicians’ credentialing/certification boards entering into quid pro quo relationships (corporative agreements) – more accurately described as BRIBES. How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications?
The war on free speech! Medical boards accused of collusion with feds as ‘State Actor’ status looms – America Out Loud News https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-war-on-free-speech-medical-boards-accused-of-collusion-with-feds-as-state-actor-status-looms/
It has been documented the major medical journals accepted money from the pharmaceutical companies and the government to publish studies supporting their draconian COVID-19 narratives. The NEJM accepted monies from the CDC. (See Figure Below). The Editor in Chief of the NEJM Eric Rubin with the Managing Editor of the NEJM Stephen Morrissey colluded with then Director of the CDC Rochelle Walensky presented blatantly false science in their NEJM publication on April 21, 2021 pushing the safety and efficacy of the experimental COVID-19 gene therapy injections in pregnant women. How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications?
The landmark safety study heralding the safety of the COVID-19 “vaccines” in the NEJM in 2021 appears to ghost written by Pfizer and demonstrated an 82% miscarriage rate associated with the COVID-19 “vaccines”. (see figure below). The 21 authors were all federal employees and the lead author Shimabukuro was employed by the federal government involved with the FDA’s vaccine safety committee since 2010. How is that NOT EXTREME BIAS affecting the global body of researchers’ opinions and publications?
Dr. James Thorp’s upcoming book:
Sacrifice2024.com
https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Menstrualchangesaftervaccine-1:4
Thousands report unusual menstruation patterns after COVID-19 vaccination
“I had what’s often called menstrual flooding,” says Clancy, a biological anthropologist at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Clancy wouldn’t have thought to connect the experience to the Moderna dose she’d received were it not for her graduate student, Katharine Lee, now at Tulane University, who shared a similar tale. “I had the worst cramps of my life” after COVID-19 vaccination, Lee says. Intrigued, Clancy—who didn’t experience similarly intense symptoms after her second dose—shared her story on Twitter. Hundreds responded with parallel stories, leading her to suspect a potential link to vaccination.
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW
https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/125742_S2_M1_pllr-cumulative-review.pdf
Biodistribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in human breast milk
Of 13 lactating women receiving the vaccine (20 exposures), trace mRNA amounts were detected in 10 exposures up to 45 h post-vaccination. The mRNA was concentrated in the breast milk extracellular vesicles;
Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into breast milk extracellular vesicles.
Since the minimum mRNA vaccine dose to elicit an immune reaction in infants <6 months is unknown, a dialogue between a breastfeeding mother and her healthcare provider should address the benefit/risk considerations of breastfeeding in the first two days after maternal vaccination.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37734205/
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext
Periodic Safety Update Report #1 (PSUR)
Pregnancy outcome: Live birth with congenital anomaly: Four(4) of these cases reported 11 congenital anomalies that coded to the PTs Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, Neonatal respiratory failure, Shock, Intestinal perforation, Newborn persistent pulmonary hypertension, Non-reassuring foetal heart rate pattern, Pneumoperitoneum, Renal tubular necrosis, Metabolic acidosis, Foetal heart rate abnormal, neonatal pneumothorax.
From the article by investigative reporter Sonia Elijah, she reports on data obtained from a Freedom of Information Act request for the EU’s Periodic Safety Update Report #3 (PSUR #3), covering the 6-month period of 19 December 2021 through to 18 June 2022, which recently became available on the Austrian Politics and Science blog, tkp.
https://tkp.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/1.PSUR_orginial.pdf
It is important to note that upon further review of PSUR #1, something extremely disturbing surfaced – adverse events were reported for breast-fed babies indirectly exposed to the PfizerBioNTech mRNA shot by their vaccinated mothers.
She discovered that Pfizer documented numerous cases of strokes, convulsions, and respiratory failure among nursing babies.
The screenshot below is taken from page 165 of PSUR #1.
The fact that two cases from the post-marketing (PM) data involved babies who were indirectly exposed to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) via the trans-mammary route (through the breast milk) and consequently suffered a stroke (central nervous system haemorrhages and cerebrovascular accidents) is shocking.
Then, on page 149 (screenshot below), three more cases of babies suffering from neurological adverse events, for example, convulsions, from being indirectly exposed to the vaccine via their vaccinated mothers’ breast milk, were recorded.
From the analysis of booster doses (> 2 dose primary series), a staggering 455 cases were recorded during the 6-month reporting interval (1 from the clinical trial data and 454 recorded from the post-marketing data) and involved babies whose cases “were excluded due to indirect exposure (transplacental/transmammary) to BNT162b2.”
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Shedding-of-COVID-mRNA-Vaccines-A-review-of-evidence-2024-02-03.pdf (pages 10-11)
Analysis of Vaccine Reactions After COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Pregnant and Lactating Individuals
Buried in the information presented in this article was the revelation that 2.4% of pregnant women (48 of 2009) and 4.0% of lactating women (411 of 10 277) reported obstetric or lactation concerns after vaccination.
The study revealed that 3.5% of women reported a decrease in breast milk supply and 1.2% reported “issues with their breast milk-fed infant after vaccination.”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2795998
Dr. Clare Craig Exposes How Pfizer Twisted Their Clinical Trial Data for Young Children
Report 28: Vaccine Trials for Infants and Children Show Little to No Benefit
The vaccine does not prevent infection or reduce transmission. Furthermore, CDC published data show a poor efficacy of 31%, reducing to 12% after 7 weeks in the 5-11 yr age range (Dorabawila 2002). The mRNA vaccines do not stop infection, replication, or spread of the Omicron variants. They are not fulfilling their intended purpose.
Run at 65 trial sites, they recruited a total of 4526 children of which, 3000 children dropped out before the end of the trial.
Pfizer presented evidence that the only antibodies produced in the children were to the Wuhan (alpha strain) spike with no detectable antibodies to the Omicron variant (Craig, HART group, 2022).
However, the trial also shows other alarming results.
There were 30% more covid cases in the vaccine arm after first dose than the placebo, so they ignored that data. The same occurred with the second and third rounds.
In total, after 2 months, COVID developed twice as much in the vaccinated vs placebo group, suggesting that there was a higher likelihood that the vaccine was causing severe COVID than the likelihood that it was not. In fact, 12 of the children got COVID twice, 11 of which were in the vaccination arm!
https://dailyclout.io/vaccine-trials-for-infants-and-children-show-little-to-no-benefit/
COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or number of persons vaccinated, all COVID-19 vaccine AEs far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds.
These results necessitate a worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.
Increased risk of fetal loss after COVID-19 vaccination
When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or number of persons vaccinated, all COVID-19 vaccine AEs far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds. Specifically for miscarriage we found the global relative risk was 177 (95% CI 114.4–283.5) compared to influenza vaccination.
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/12/2536/7308743?login=false
Steve Kirsch summarized the above article:
The graphics below are from Dr. Byram Bridle:
The direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 virus vaccination on human ovarian granulosa cells explains menstrual irregularities
Human primary GCs exposed in-vitro to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2, demonstrated no change in their viability but altered mRNA transcripts, specifically of the regulatory key factors: InhibinB was upregulated, whereas AMH was downregulated. We further examined pre- and post-vaccination blood samples from individual women and found a 2-3 folds change in the post-vaccination FSH/InhibinB protein level ratio, compared to their pre-vaccination values. This altered expression of InhibinB could significantly impact the HPO axis in vaccinated women and may ultimately influence the endometrium cyclicity, manifested clinically by the commonly reported changes in menstrual bleeding patterns.
Articles by Children’s Health Defense
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/infant-mortality-vaccine-doses/
As of December 1, 2024, despite vast evidence to the contrary, the following FALSE claims are still being made by the CDC:
Everyone ages 6 months and older is recommended to get the updated COVID-19 vaccine, including people who are pregnant, breastfeeding a baby, trying to get pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future.
- COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective.
- COVID-19 vaccines are not associated with fertility problems in women or men.
- Infants ages 6 months and older are recommended to get the updated COVID-19 vaccine even if born to people who were vaccinated or had COVID-19 before or during pregnancy.
- If you are pregnant or were recently pregnant, you are more likely to get very sick from COVID-19, compared to those who are not pregnant. Additionally, if you have COVID-19 during pregnancy, you are at increased risk of complications that can affect your pregnancy and your baby from serious illness from COVID-1
Studies including hundreds of thousands of people around the world show that COVID-19 vaccination before and during pregnancy is safe, effective, and beneficial to both the pregnant person and the baby. The benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any potential risks of vaccination during pregnancy. Data show:
- It is safe to receive an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech), before and during pregnancy. Both vaccines show no increased risk for complications like miscarriage, preterm delivery, stillbirth, or birth defects.
- mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy are effective. They reduce the risk of severe illness and other health effects from COVID-19 for people who are pregnant. COVID-19 vaccination might help prevent stillbirths and preterm delivery.
- Receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy can help protect babies younger than age 6 months from hospitalization due to COVID-19.
CDC recommends that people who are breastfeeding a baby, and infants 6 months of age and older, get vaccinated and stay up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines.
Vaccines are safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 in people who are breastfeeding a baby. Available data on the safety of COVID-19 vaccination while breastfeeding indicate no severe reactions after vaccination in the breastfeeding person or the breastfed child.
There has been no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines are harmful to either people who have received a vaccine and are breastfeeding or to their babies.
https://www.cdc.gov/covid/vaccines/pregnant-or-breastfeeding.html
The propaganda below is provided by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)
https://www.acog.org/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines-and-pregnancy-conversation-guide-for-clinicians
James Roguski
310-619-3055
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
ControlBloodSugarNaturally.com
I claim no copyright of any kind whatsoever, over any of my work, ever. Everyone is encouraged to copy any and all of it, in part, or in full, and use it for whatever purposes they wish. In fact, I would be delighted if someone were to copy this entire body of work. I encourage everyone to duplicate and mirror it in its entirety. I also encourage everyone to adapt and utilize the information in whatever manner they deem appropriate. No citation or other reference is requested or required. It would actually bring me great joy to see this information multiply exponentially and “go viral”.
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
SOURCE:Evidence of Harm to Unborn and Nursing Infants and Their Mothers
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.