THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM’S PLAN FOR SOUTH AFRICA AS TESTING GROUND FOR THEIR EVIL PLANS-AGENDA 2030

*1. The Land Bill and Property Seizure*

• Core Conspiracy: The Land Expropriation Bill is not merely a policy to address historical land imbalances but a calculated move to strip private landowners of their property under the guise of “public interest.”

• Agenda 2030 Tie-In: By invoking the vague language of “public interest,” the government gains the power to reallocate land to meet the global “30×30” biodiversity conservation goals. The ultimate aim is to centralize control of land, remove private ownership, and align South Africa’s policies with WEF directives for a green global economy.

• Claim: Ramaphosa secured R576 billion in environmental funding by promising to enforce this policy, making private reserves inaccessible for commercial use, such as lodges and tourism.

*2. 30% of Land Going Back to Nature*

• Core Conspiracy: The “30×30” initiative isn’t about protecting the planet but about creating state-controlled zones devoid of human interference, effectively removing people from vast swathes of land.

• Evidence Tie-In: Countries globally are being pressured to comply with this target as part of the UN’s Agenda 2030. South Africa, with its vast biodiversity, becomes a testing ground for these draconian measures. Private reserves, game farms, and rural lands are reclassified under “protected areas,” leaving owners powerless to use their property.

*3. Ramaphosa as a “Puppet” of WEF and UN*

• Core Conspiracy: Ramaphosa, a known participant in WEF summits, is part of a global elite executing the Great Reset. His policies are framed to appear beneficial to South Africans but are directed by WEF agendas to centralize power and resources globally.

• Supporting Claim: WEF openly promotes partnerships with governments to reshape economies and societies. By aligning South Africa with these goals, Ramaphosa secures international funding and support at the cost of national sovereignty.

*4. Speed Limits and Environmental Control*

• Core Conspiracy: The reduction of speed limits is not about road safety but a subtle method of reducing emissions to meet international climate goals.

• Evidence Tie-In: WEF publications often highlight transport-related carbon footprints. South Africa’s compliance signals deeper alignment with global green initiatives that prioritize climate targets over public convenience.

*5. Loadshedding as a CO2 Reduction Strategy*

• Core Conspiracy: Loadshedding isn’t just a result of Eskom’s mismanagement but a deliberate strategy to reduce South Africa’s carbon emissions under UN and WEF directives.

• Claim: By limiting electricity supply, the government achieves lower emissions targets without investing in renewable energy. This aligns with international agreements but devastates the local economy and quality of life.

*6. Signing of BELA and NHI Bills*

• Core Conspiracy: The BELA and NHI Bills are part of a broader strategy to centralize control over education and healthcare.

• Claim: By taking control of school governance (BELA) and healthcare services (NHI), the government enforces policies aligned with global standards rather than local needs. This creates a dependency on state systems, mirroring WEF’s vision of a “shared economy” where individuals own nothing and rely entirely on state-provided services.

*7. Blindsiding Opposition*

• Core Conspiracy: Ramaphosa’s alleged secretive signing of key bills without proper consultation suggests a deliberate bypassing of democratic processes.

• Claim: This is indicative of a global agenda prioritizing international commitments over national interests, with the government acting as an enforcer rather than a representative of the people.

*8. The Overarching Agenda*

*• The “Bigger Picture”:*

*• South Africa is a testing ground for WEF’s Great Reset, Agenda 2030, and UN climate goals.*

• Policies are framed as addressing local issues (land reform, education, health) but are actually designed to dismantle private ownership, enforce compliance with international climate goals, and centralize state power.

• Leaders like Ramaphosa are seen as key players in this global scheme, rewarded with funding and international support for implementing these measures.